President Bola Tinubu is not in any position to condemn the military coup in the Niger Republic because he did the same thing in Nigeria. Let the truth be told.

Those who are elected by the people of their various countries are defined as having a democratic system of government, which is government of the people, and the people are the only ones in a position to condemn a military takeover in any country where it exists. As long as President Bola Tinubu remains the president of Nigeria, he is not in any position to condemn the military coup in the Niger Republic because he came to power through manipulative democracy, which is worse than the military coup. Now hear more of our points: a military coup is carried out by the armed forces of a country to achieve their purpose, but manipulative democracy is carried out by rigging elections to install yourself and those that would work with you for personal gains. A situation where electoral processes are hijacked, which would render the economy of a whole country useless. Again, leaders in a manipulative democracy would keep the citizens of their various countries under pressure, which may lead to poverty and even death in the long run. This is the worst form of government anyone can think of because you are forcing yourself on the people when you are not needed.

Source: Viewers Corner News

Translate »
Scroll to Top